An error in yesterday's CRIMSON caused a good deal of upset among returning parents in the Class of 1933, who read that "a nine year old son" had praised his rooming accommodations. The minimum age for admission to the Reunion is ten, which is the correct age (plus three months) of the lad who spoke so vociferously Monday night.
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
Read more in News
Tenant TalkRecommended Articles
-
Knife in the WaterIf the bourgeois ideal has really been liquidated behind the Iron Curtain, the Polish drama Knife in the Water does
-
Class of '33 May Set New Reunion Attendance MarkA record total of alumni will return to the University to attend their Twenty-fifth Reunion this year if Mid-May enrollment
-
The VagabondAs the Vagabond lay musing in his Tower last evening and weaving many a journey for his gentle readers he
-
Ninety-four vs. Ninety-five.The first game of the class championship series will be played tomorrow afternoon on Norton's Field. Owing to the early
-
BulletinIn a surprise vote last night, the Cambridge School Committee appointed Francis J. Frisoli '35 permanent superintendent of the Cambridge
-
Picket Parade in Yard to Open Peace Drive TodayAs the opening salve of their Spring Peace Offensive, the Harvard Student Union will organize a "Peace Picket Line" in
