The Corporation's decision to open Memorial Church to private services of non-Protestant religions is a welcome one. While not so significant as the 1886 decree ending compulsory chapel, this latest addition to religious policy reaffirms the University's liberal tradition.
By changing the statutes governing Memorial Church, the Corporation has made it an institution which recognizes the diversity of religious opinion at Harvard as well as preserving the spirit in which the church was dedicated. Such a transformation will establish the church more firmly in Harvard's religious life than it could have been on its narrower base.
But the ruling does more than strengthen Memorial Church. It settles one of the chief points of discussion of the past few weeks and allows more constructive consideration of the general question of religion's place at Harvard. Such discussion, when rational and impersonal, clarifies issues and benefits the University. The Corporation's action has smoothed the way for further objective examination and has bolstered Harvard's acceptance of diversity, and for both the College is grateful.
Read more in News
Business School May Meet During SummerRecommended Articles
-
Harvard Establishes Memorial Church Scholarship In Epps' HonorAt a retirement dinner for Dean of Students Archie C. Epps III Saturday night, officials announced that a new fellowship
-
25 Years for the Preacher ManBy 8:45 every Thursday morning, Rev. Peter J. Gomes has descended the suspended stairwell of his grand yellow house on
-
Publicly Funded Parochial Schools?One nation under God? As apathy and low moral confidence spread, Americans are increasingly advocating a publicly funded return to
-
THE SECULAR TRADITIONTo the Editors of the CRIMSON: To a great many of us, the Memorial Church had never seemed a very
-
Professors Disagree On Church IssueTwo members of the Divinity School Faculty yesterday disagreed in their opinions on the University's policy on the use of
-
Church and CorporationToday the Harvard Corporation can dim the most glaring aspect of the "religious controversy." To do so it must reverse