To the Editors of the CRIMSON:
I write in reply to a letter of Daniel M. Musher '59, on the planning of History tutorial.
At a meeting of the Department of History on March 13 it was agreed that the proposed tutorial course in the Junior year could not be related to the student's work in his special field. Mr. Musher is therefore not correctly informed in supposing that "tutorial in History...has become...a rather detailed study of the philosophy of history, apparently with the wholehearted approval of the department." Myron P. Gilmore Chairman, Department of History
Advertisement
Want to keep up with breaking news?
Subscribe to our email newsletter.
Read more in News
Business School May Meet During SummerRecommended Articles
-
History Dept. Boosts EnrollmentAn improved tutorial program and a low faculty to student ratio has paid off for the History department. In the
-
Handlin Opposes Credit In Sophomore TutorialProposals within the History Department to make sophomore tutorial a credit course were sharply criticized yesterday by Oscar Handlin, Winthrop
-
PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORYTo the Editors of the CRIMSON: Members of the history department have been discussing at great length the problem of
-
Departments Institute CEP Tutorial PlanThe Departments of Economics and History have decided to eliminate compulsory non-Honors junior tutorial, and substitute individual tutorial in the
-
Womack, Maier Will Assume Top History Department PostsJohn Womack '59, professor of History, has been recommended by senior Faculty members to become the new History Department chairman
-
History . . .History is a subject which still puts a premium on the memory. If you have a reasonably good one, if
