The Christian heritage is definitely a proper topic of study in a liberal education, as is any other major religion, James B. Adams, Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Professor of Divinity, declared yesterday.
Adams insisted, however, that a survey course in Christian culture must be subjected to the same complete freedom of inquiry as any other descipline. "Christianity cannot expect any special place or privilege," he said.
While the study of Western religions has a particular value and pertinence in our culture, Adams explained, it should not become a forum for "apologetics."
Adams saw two major obstacles to a College course in Christian culture. First, he doubted whether a unitary Christian heritage exists, since the dialogue of opposing viewpoints tends to give any heritage a complex character.
Secondly, Adams pointed out that the comparative element in any critical inquiry is important. The so-called anti-Christian heritage is often more in line with the Christian intention than is that of "trumped-up orthodoxy," he said.
Read more in News
HarvardRecommended Articles
-
K-School Plans ProgramOrganizers of the Kennedy School of Government's orientation for newly-elected members of congress are going full speed ahead, despite speculation
-
A New Future for Black Arts Fest“Does one start with the polyrhythmic music of West Africa or the primordial tragedy of the blues? Should one start
-
Softball Splits Twinbill with League Power Cornell
-
Crimson Articles Fuel a Political Controversy
-
Warren Speaks Out on Heritage AccusationsAfter weeks of speculation, Elizabeth Warren released an official statement Thursday confirming that she had claimed Native American heritage to both Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania. Warren remained adamant, however, that her descent did not have an impact on job offers, as those who hired her had no knowledge of her background when they offered her the positions.
-
HKS Dissertation on Immigration and I.Q. Draws CriticismA recently unearthed 2009 Ph.D. dissertation approved by Harvard Kennedy School faculty has drawn strong criticism for its assertion that low-IQ individuals—a demographic that the author says is disproportionately Hispanic or of other non-white or non-Asian ethnicities—should be restricted from immigrating to the United States because they lack “raw cognitive ability or intelligence.”