Today's meeting of two of New England's most unpredictable football outfits in the giant New Haven saucer fluds the gentlemen of the press box in their usual position concerning the outcome. A small but hardy band is way out on a limb stringing along with the Crimson, while the more conservative elements hug the trunk of the arbor prognosticoris and give the Bulldog a slim but definite hug the trunk of the arbor prognosticoris and give the Bulldog a slim but definite margin.

Jack Conway, Boston American: "The Crimson goes into enemy territory on at loast even odds with Yale. The myth of Yale superiority is very unfounded."

Jesse Abramson, New York Herald Tribune: "An upset is possible in a game that has suddenly become a tossup, in the way this one has."

Stanley Woodward, New York Herald Tribune: "I'm going downtown right now and get five on Harvard with ten points in a hurry."

Arthur Siegel, Boston Traveler: "The odds are on Yale by eight points, but if Yale is, on paper, only one touchdown better, then Harvard can win on the field."

Dean Brelis, Boston Globe: "Harvard's practice this week has been the most exciting soon on Soldiers Field this year."

Williamson ratings: Yale 88.7, Harvard 86.3.

That's the way it goes all along the line, So-called "antart-cash" is down on Yale, while many of the brethren prefer to call it the other way, shrugging off their decision in much the same fashion as Vern Miller '42, ex-tackle and Globe reporter, who explains his hopes for a Harvani win with "I've just got the feeling in my bones, and it's always been pretty reliable."