To the Editors of the Crimson:

In addition to the work of UNRRA and the contributions of the American people toward food for Europe, it also seems pertinent to consider another aspect of European reconstruction; that of rebuilding the towns and areas which have been either partially or completely destroyed by war.

Of the devastated countries which will need help in rebuilding, France, having borne the brunt of German occupation on her twice-contested land, seems to me foremost. The pioneer French functional architect, Edouard Le Corbusier, an adviser to the French Minister of Reconstruction and Town planning, has estimated that 150,000 new communities will be needed in France to replace those destroyed. Speaking, however, of those civilians who must have immediate but temporary shelter, he says: "They don't want a new, clean, modern town. They just want to rebuild the same old hovels on the same old spots where their grandfathers built them."

Here, however, is a golden opportunity to make the break with tradition. But because of the staggering French taxation, which must be largely allocated for food and defense, it seems logical to expect that some of the financial burden of reconstruction must fall on countries, such as the United States, who can pay and who should feel partly obligated to pay.

As a veteran recently returned from France and one who has seen the appalling destruction, I propose therefore one way in which we, as individuals and independent of Congressional action, might help bear this financial burden and also contribute immensely to France-American goodwill (which has been seriously damaged by GIs overseas):

That Harvard University select from among the countless devastated areas, one French town, approximately equal in size to Cambridge, and to raise, by voluntary contribution, a fund to be used for the rebuilding of that French town.

I suggest also that this fund be given to the people of the town selected as a memorial to the Harvard graduates who gave their lives in World War II.

Public opinion would have to decide its willingness to sponsor and support such a project. If we were to set a precedent in this matter, possibly other towns and colleges would join in the plan until it becomes widespread. I feel that the students of Harvard would give their approval, not only to a "Memorial Town For France," but also to a concrete demonstration of goodwill and a lasting investment in the world bank of peace. Henry S. Williams.