(Ed. Note--The Crimson does not necessarily endorse opinions expressed in printed communications. No attention will be paid to anonymous letters and only under special conditions, at the request of the writer, will names be withheld. Only letters under 400 words can be printed because of space limitations.)

To the Editor of the Crimson:

I have just read, in today's (Saturday's) Crimson, your editorial about the necessity of having a magazine which might publish lectures given at Harvard. I want to congratulate you very much on your proposal.

May I point out that there exists, in France, the "Revue des Courset Conferences" which does exactly what you have in mind?

I have always thought that it is very desirable to print the most important lectures delivered at the University, and I should like to suggest that the printing of lectures would be a great step in bringing together the two fields of activity: research and teaching, as well as in solving the superficial conflict arising from the two tasks of a University professor. Moreover, is it not worth stressing the fact that University teaching--differing in this respect from College instruction--ought to be accompanied by research? This, however, is not always possible on account of the heavy teaching load that a University professor carried. But would it not be advisable to lighten the burden of class-room instruction so that there might be more opportunity for original research? Marcel Francon.