"It is too soon to make radical changes in the Tutorial System", said Arthur N. Holcombe '06, professor of Government, when questioned yesterday concerning the recent controversy over suggested tutorial reductions. "Many of the differences which have appeared in connection with the operation of the System will be remedied with further experience.

"If it is desired to save money, no doubt some economics are possible. In fact, two possible economics might be considered. The first of these would be to stop tutoring Sophomores taking introductory courses in their fields of concentration. Another possible means of saving would be to make the use of the Tutorial System optional for men on probation and perhaps for other men in low-standing. Neither of these economics would weaken the System.

"I am in entire sympathy with the instruction rather than tutorial instruction, should be reduced for undergraduates. Some further steps might well be taken at this time to reduce the emphasis on examinations in courses, not regularly open to Freshmen.

"It must be remembered that the Tutorial System of instruction is built around work library rather than laboratory work. Any plans for economics must take into account the differences in different fields of study".

Other members of the Faculty have also made statements opposing any radical changes in the System. Among them one professor said "In the long run, I see no essential justification of the peculiarly American system of 'course-credits' where suitable substitutes, such as tutorial guidance, seminar organization, and comprehensive written or oral examinations are in effect".

Less general was the statement of a tutor in the department of Economics, who spoke concerning the suggested reduction of expenditures in his department, "On first consideration, it seemed to me that the Tutorial System was of so great importance that any reduction would be fantastic. After thinking the matter over, however, I realize that there is much waste motion in the System's operation, which it would be desirable to eliminate."