In another page we print a communication questioning the policy of Harvard in offering its support to a military or naval reserve on the ground that it detracts from the support which the University should give to the movement for international peace and the settlement of international disputes by arbitration. As expressing the views of a large number of men and as contrasted in sentiment with the enthusiasm with which the proposition of Captain Marsh was generally received, the communication is interesting as indicative of the diversity of student interests and opinions.

We believe, however, that those working for international peace and who object to the plan for introducing college men in the army and navy, do not understand the aims and intentions of the government. The desirability of international peace we readily admit, but in the present stage of civilization it is a remote possibility. The probability of internal strife alone makes imperative the maintenance of a large army and navy. The need of men of education and superior intelligence in the rank and file of the army and navy we have explained and emphasized before. But the most important feature of the proposed reserve is the opportunity which it offers to college men for naval and military training and experience. The association of college men with regulars in the service is designed to bring about a closer understanding between men differing widely in training and circumstances. We are proud of what Harvard men have done to bring about international peace, and believe that they will continue to be prominent in the work. But in no sense in the present movement to establish a military and naval reserve reactionary. It is a plan to give college men new opportunities for instruction and patriotic service and to raise the moral and mental standards of the army and navy. As such it should be understood and deserves the support of all Harvard men.