The editors of the Lampoon, by their rather startling methods of replying to our criticism of April 22, show that they have chosen to find a feeling of ill-will and even bitterness in an editorial which we wrote in perfect good will and friendliness. But our criticism, we still maintain, was well-founded. We have frequently heard the same criticism made in the college at large, and at the time of our writing knew well that we were by no means alone in our position. And simply because we wrote with both sincerity and good will, we have not the least reason for regretting what we wrote. But we do regret that our worthy contemporary should feel so sore over the matter. We are ever ready to receive well-meant criticism ourselves; we do not intend to give up our own right of offering it to others. But, however the Lampoon may have felt over our critical editorial, it is very noticeable that the criticisms are much less applicable to the current number of the paper than they have been to the three or four preceding numbers. Of course no one can be more glad to see this change than we are.