EDITORS DAILY CRIMSON:-In your issue of Tuesday, a communication signed by "Unfortunates in Eng. 7," complained that "the lecture devoted to Gay and Prior" was "required for the examination." It was claimed that "notice was given" that these lectures would not be required. We are sorry for the "Unfortunates," but fear that the trouble is their own misfortune. Prof. Palmer did not give notice that the two lectures which he devoted to prior and Gay would not be required for examination. He did say that no extra study of the authors in question would be required, but no one of the questions or allusions to Prior or Gay lay outside of what Prof. Palmer had distinctly said in his lectures. While it is very true that some one has blundered, that some one is not Prof. Palmer.
Read more in News
Fact and Rumor.
